Misconduct Investigation Allegation Letters. When AWPTI conducts an investigation we provide all the documentation including letters of allegation to our clients however I am often asked “Should we provide some sort of letter or email with the allegations?”
The answer is always YES.

Why: Recently I published an article about allegation letters, procedural fairness and why it is essential…Read more

In the case at the FWC of K v K&S Freighters Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 1555 (24 March 2016) an employee of 30 years was dismissed over misuse of a fuel card.  Commissioner Bissett found there was a valid reason for dismissal but there had been was a lack of procedural fairness.

The commission was satisfied the applicant sent freight without consignment notes, sent freight without charge and used a fuel card while he was on annual leave. Mr Kirkbright’s argument that this was how it had always been was not satisfactory.

Lack of procedural fairness

The Commissioner found that Mr Kirkbright was not advised that his conduct was an issue or were being investigated. In addition he was not provided with an opportunity to consider what was being alleged or the opportunity to respond.

The commission also considered that the HR department should have been better prepared for the meeting where Mr Kirkbright was dismissed:

“Whilst Mr K’s language in the meeting of 17 August 2015 leaves much to be desired; he displayed an appalling lack of respect for his manager and co-worker and this was the first time he had been confronted with the allegations. His reaction was not outside the realm of possibilities and should have been foreseen. The human resource manager, if she had not, should have walked the HR officer through what to do in such a circumstance.”

“The meeting should have been halted, Mr K given the allegations in writing and he should have been given an opportunity to respond either in writing or in a meeting at a future date (which could have been in a couple of days).”

The Commission found that the lack of procedural fairness and long service of the employee were both relevant.

On providing an opportunity to respond the commission said:

“In Crozier v Palazzo Corporation Pty Ltd… the full bench said:  As a matter of logic procedural fairness would require that an employee be notified of a valid reason for their termination before any decision is taken to terminate their employment in order to provide them with an opportunity to respond to the reason identified…”

Mr Kirkbright sought reinstatement but it was considered inappropriate. The matter was set down for compensation to be considered.

Later in Kirkbright v K&S Freighters Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 2743 (4 May 2016) the Commission ordered compensation in the amount of $11,624.25 plus superannuation.

Misconduct Investigation Allegation Letters – Lessons for employers

  • Procedural fairness cannot be ignored, it requires an employer to provides any employee accused of misconduct with a chance to respond and put their side or version of events forward before any final decision is made.
  • Don’t take short cuts, it’s not worth it in the long run.
  • If you are not sure what to do, get help, call an expert.

As I mentioned when we conduct investigations we ensure that all the documentation is legally complaint and that procedural fairness is afforded. If you wish to conduct investigations into misconduct internally I recommend;

  1. Have your people, HR professionals or managers trained. AWPTI can provide 1 and 2 day investigation training courses for HR professionals or managers – Read more
  2. If you have an understanding of the investigative process make sure all your documentation is complaint. For those that wish to DIY we have created an Investigation Document Toolbox – Read more
  3. Read our TOP TEN tips for workplace Investigations Misconduct, Complaints and Grievances – Read more

AWPTI – workplace investigation Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide

Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations, discrimination investigations

www.awpti.com.au
http://awpti.com.au/investigations/
http://awpti.com.au/training/

 

Discrimination Investigation Sydney 

Discrimination Investigation Sydney – Discrimination is any behaviour, practice or omission that makes distinctions between individuals or groups, so as to disadvantage some and advantage others.

Discrimination is unlawful on the grounds of:

  • Age
  • Carers’ responsibilities
  • Disability – physical or intellectual disability, HIV/AIDS
  • Gender
  • Irrelevant criminal record
  • Marital status, including occupation of spouse or partner
  • Parental status and carer/family responsibilities
  • Physical appearance
  • Political conviction
  • Pregnancy or potential pregnancy
  • Race, nationality or ethnic origin
  • Religious belief
  • Sexuality or sexual orientation
  • Social origin
  • Trade union activity
  • Transgender

Unlawful discrimination can take two forms:

1) Direct

2) Indirect

Direct discrimination

Is any action that excludes a person or a group because of an irrelevant personal characteristic, for example, an individual is treated less favourably on the basis of an attribute that the person may possess, such as race or disability.  Direct discrimination can include:

  • Not giving someone a promotion because of their gender
  • Forcing an employee to retire at 60 years of age
  • Employment advertising that has requirements, such as minimum age, which is not critical to the job

 Indirect discrimination

Occurs where a condition, requirement or rule is imposed, which on the surface is neutral or equal, but in fact operates in a way that discriminates against particular groups that have some characteristic in common (such as gender or national origin).  For example:

  • An advert that requires candidates to be 180cm tall for a certain job may be indirectly discriminating against most women
  • A requirement that everybody has to wear a company cap could be indirect discrimination on the grounds of religion. This is because members of some religions are required, as part of their faith to cover their head with particular headwear and wearing a cap would not be appropriate. This does not apply to appropriate and necessary safety wear
  • Removing the flexibility in start and finish times may discriminate against parents who are required to pick up children from school

Discrimination does not include

  • Legitimate and appropriate management including the management of performance
  • Legitimate and appropriate performance review
  • Management of work-related interpersonal conflicts and occasional differences of opinion which may be more appropriately addressed under a dispute resolution policy
  • Investigations into bona fide complaints
  • Participation in dispute resolution processes

When investigating workplace discrimination it is important to get all the facts and evidence, conduct the process in a timely and professional manner and make determinations  adhering to procedural fairness guidelines.

If you are unsure about conductingdiscrimination investigations, contact Australian Workplace training and Investigations, we can help, contact us on 02 9674 4279 or enquiries@awpti.com.au

Check out our other blog articles about discrimination investigations.

AWPTI provides professional discrimination investigations in a timely manner within your budget

AWPTI – workplace investigations Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide
Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations

www.awpti.com.au
http://awpti.com.au/investigations/